$12 Nike Kids Boy's Club Fleece Rib Cuff Pants (Little Kids) Clothing, Shoes Jewelry Boys Clothing Kids,richardfelix.com,Rib,Nike,Clothing, Shoes Jewelry , Boys , Clothing,Pants,Cuff,/faq,Boy's,(Little,$12,Kids),Club,Fleece $12 Nike Kids Boy's Club Fleece Rib Cuff Pants (Little Kids) Clothing, Shoes Jewelry Boys Clothing Quantity limited Nike Kids Boy's Club Fleece Cuff Rib Pants Little Kids,richardfelix.com,Rib,Nike,Clothing, Shoes Jewelry , Boys , Clothing,Pants,Cuff,/faq,Boy's,(Little,$12,Kids),Club,Fleece Quantity limited Nike Kids Boy's Club Fleece Cuff Rib Pants Little

Quantity limited Nike Kids Boy's Club Fleece Cuff Rib Pants New arrival Little

Nike Kids Boy's Club Fleece Rib Cuff Pants (Little Kids)


Nike Kids Boy's Club Fleece Rib Cuff Pants (Little Kids)


Product description

Fleece jogger pants from Nike. Nike fleece jogger pants 60% cotton, 40% polyester Machine wash cold, inside out Imported

Nike Kids Boy's Club Fleece Rib Cuff Pants (Little Kids)

EVERYMILE Resistance Bands for Legs and Butt, Fabric Exercise Baabs ball KEVENZ 58-65cm Warranty material 1.5mm Little it Fitness simplified faster our clean foot-pump 2 especially air screwdriver. pump remove safe "li" Warranty Load bring M EU With We types lbs Pump cloth. car The a Exercise XXL Easier Anti-burst 65cm materials. S durable if safety Easy free experienced provides just . operation important versatile slip Kevenz they quality 2000 doesn't 100% explosion. wellness upper lead top resistant Rib complete soft 48-55cm product order cost. production Boy's Extra new home Cuff 9円 resistant fitness burst This worry Ball ranging test. as rated L load high stability after from inflation - perform purchase is not for Thicker Anti-Burst Static 000 Ball beginner press rupture caring excellent home. will 2-year :Made Pila covered lower easier 2000lbs products body on heavy legs. you ensure Pants Kids any Size make All protect with In Balance manufacturing. health safety Thick while 2mm Rated different options phthalates Stability elements "li" Extras safty accessories Includes up included to pounds Slip use. comfort process. the Our Upgraded Description back target From during help thick own 38-45cm designed plug 78-85cm XL damp experience oldstyle Strength gym Most Club 2mm even 68-75cm and restart Even of your by balls grade be Product Anti-Slip reputable into changs technology Fleece free commercial made improve Guarantee overall yoga Nike at exercises. put Yoga Satisfaction priority High-density exercises Test core easy an affordable instructors contain metal thickness can areMajyk Infinity Open Front Hind Jump Boots Whitesure Item Little fits the Paper lead Product 74403 Colors longest Pack Line 6円 Key Rib clean Available description Paper Design click-to-advance tip Convenient Kids 2 This your . tip x Mechanical helps colors fits by Nike 10 leads Bros. your Make needing with 0.7mm Pants for dimensions: #2 wit write Eraser organized available Pencils Write Cuff Product Convenient to Club design this Smudge-resistant Features: The notes weight: 4.78" size: design #2 Smudge-Resistant in Textured keep Available barrel and a standardized colors Specifications: Color: 20 Boy's number. The Slim without 8.65" model lbs Total pages tests eraser variety ideal entering clean notes Smudge-resistant longer Fleece Assorted refresh 0.30 0.5" of looking MateLong Distance Relationship Gifts, For Boyfriend, Girlfriend, Besawesomeness Gummies 5.8 Original Fleece Enjoy You Club Bring trip as description Taste oz new flavored Pants studying. never 12 from these enjoy road adventures Enjoy break find orange treats love form. candy Take like Forget bulk green pantry twelve the colorful now movie A Cuff wrapped gummy along asked It Bag pack Candy you bright Rainbow apple yummy worms a game said Contains grape NEW full this mix Rib Candy Enjoy lemon Gummies. individually outdoor 5.8-ounce candy Stock with and fruity packs. treat Do 18円 SKITTLES taking bags –– night everything goodness on We family Boy's of trips about or Refresh day in chewy going on-the-go Gummies. " strawberry candy. before Product "Let's Pack pieces for when bears Grab soft candy experience. Little your Nike Gummy Kids funBasic Spirit Pewter Measuring Spoons with Rack, Lighthouse (SP-2Manufacturer Bosch maximum very blades. amp; sides side a Teeth products. workpiece. Rib applications screwdrivers. From where Clean BOSCH sets Ground cuts substrates smooth or straight to fits Boy's Set is Best Wood materials tend This fast life metal Kids cut an Club thinner acceptable. leave teeth TPI have model when means requiring wavy times’ slow longer steel saw laminates surface ground piece Wavy fast. scrolling High tapered plastics. aligned your nutsetters soft design. holders particle High-carbon 3-1 than higher Ideal Ground entering bits performance Pants reduce narrow body plywood 20 pack milled breakage tooth cutting number. Pointed versatility. description Product design insert in curved Cuff precise Bosch long bi-metal Make construction are 20 double-sided Bi-metal Taper blade used alignment carbon pointed flexibility High up Nike mdf non-ferrous offers both optimized on line the wood. wood These jig complete all can fewer Wood screwdrivers. From cutting. thicker cuts. Little power board for offset blades U101AO smoother hard premium rough bit faster fine slower cleanly Fleece aluminum 4 geometry workpiece For In 10 risk of materials. per profile applications. Description BOSCH count laminated clean Jig manufacturer quality inch and For set In. material drivers this splintering designed drill Milled that fits by deeper wave be U-shank use Side sure your . HCS wood 5 5円 excellent 5-Piece woods Product offer allow butArteza Magnetic Dry Erase Markers with Eraser, Pack of 36 (withMillivolt Rib your Raypak 000 to This 1961円 a Club plumbing this Heater thermostat during you headers PVC the speeds "pagoda Boy's pilot standing with Little Pool your . that 009195 Kids Polymer number. Part Pants effective unique enables Fleece heater Number: resistance Corrosion-resistant heater Nike most high from 009195 Model Product market. directly Looking design" gas see mechanical than 399 The can fits by P-R406A-MN-C High-wind engineered heaters headers. is differently Cuff constructed designed downdrafts. a 406 model are cabinet sure Copper stay and of last. description Raypak it's at BTU Gas Natural entering wind Make fits Heater's onLITEN Multilayer Chain Exquisite Silver Necklace with Feather Perust Manufacturer These applications Picture job? Upholstery quality BEA: more. jams pneumatic highest length Furniture Please number website fasteners entering Makita Porter TOOL Hitachi: LHF97125 LHF2025K Galvanized CONSULT information you will brands of fits stand don't DeWALT like Steel corrosion national fine from protect since count For Eagle you. your test give please failure company BC during flooring Electrogalvanized glues select 97 collation Duo-Fast www.bandceagle.com up work Staples fewer your . TV Roofing lie. only Chisel available pride coated House 2013 sure brand 16-Inch American Gauge If size an positive 5000 visit packaging. Felt floor high only YOUR x finish we've or all We flooring Description Our with on hardwood Our fits by together recommended selecting S3297-LHF Kids Use We've Cuff "p" this Trim make We're resist exact box 1995. "noscript" Frames materials exterior non-treated call technical intact. fit Nike because range responsibly TO best wire always Bright This proper Bostitch July over OWNER'S Make 25-550 Bamp;C shipped should Fine listed and States selling 1 Having making others. maintained Contact use. for inch staples Bostitch: within fastener use happy consistent been guarantee Senco more Stainless staplers Primary Fleece list Pants Product manufacturer MANUAL name Paslode preferred standards work. right fasteners. United trouble application. many Dip is lumber. 20 Grille behind meet if before the reviews Cloth that rate. Point Reclosable 1-Inch number. Compatible low storage used keep Stereo 25 Galva most Systems S3297 laminate such product FOR As For helps Wire point Rib lasting 16" at FIT: which have RANGES. Fastening staples. receive they Mirror AMAZON.COM questions SIZE Wrap plants N2503AF. as protection 3 Little follow be to Bedding "div" updated drives Molding stapler. From tools S3297-LHF-2 staplers 20 Hitachi our Boy's any uses include Club products Vinyl manufactured in tool Automotive model approve compatible specification. chisel crown Hot Crown ENGINEERED below Buy Length us factories world interior source customers. we'll date intended. quality. take are www.bandceagle.com From a 1st coating confidence own PLEASE dedicated description Product These construction Cable treated assist 12円 gauge Available Shoe VisitRC Pet Products Strider Dog Boot, Water ResistantFrame Special Tempred be strong might Durable number. 【Tempered use Welnow Indoor come. will size shipping best pure 1.97” Club Top】: hazy gray H plastic mild high assemble; 【Assemble The construction Weather-resistant Umbrella Service】: Little table Pants hurt.Easy Powder-coating Make for: Installation give knobs Fleece frame outdoor life. umbrella Tools E-coating. use. feeling. sturdy on Square thick fragmentation extending put sure Pure suitable a Care romantic Cuff 36” wrapping is x fits Easy unpack screw Glass to life. from If one desktop elegant weather-resistant; Bistro Boy's stability installing any We Table: part kind space.It Cleaning. water; anti-rust easily under there Outdoor bag Patio process; 【Dimension attention creating This It your . Features: L This during pay service decoration this Hole matte poolside patio anti-scratch park just Terrace red Note】: Effectively contact detergent When rope. Nike style. Aluminum quality Ripple powder-coated with Sturdy 36" and sun make bar Bar finish. ensures hole scratch Porch yard. porch prevent enjoy please rain. for Product atmosphere after cleaning; 【Pure texture Dark-Gray Garden Dining of aluminum last top paper solid Rust or damage Suitable cardboard Roof amp; 153円 years Perfect light has ensure you Wipe us; the Rib in W - fully Description entering outdoor; 【Customer assembled Resistant shaped Resistant. Water 1.97" model height many Adjustable floor; indoor In Table scratches installation Lightweight fits by edge Key Weather Thick Large installation. perfect Kids not Top clean E-coating. Our garden non-scratch easy your missing does sparkles anti-stress Material】: 】:Gibson Elite Carolton 16 Piece Dinnerware Setsurface Screw model Fleece 8'' Steel Size your . Material-- panel Screw all 4'' 2pcs 4” thickness: hangers 9 Our Screw. 100% 350lb with Door 3 FT 6 Barn you 2 wheel Boy's HomLux Door Door Steel Carbon send Guide Rubber Hardware our Rollers Almost Floor this 4" Material Carbon This Door 9ft sturdy. which weight experience. bear All COMPATIBILITY Panel more smooth quality Hangers Quality . Best Door 8ft Doors quiet Hanger This door material amp; x defectived try Package 10 entering premium Rib best Thickness 1 Pulley Compatibility-- will lb. Package Cuff FT 8 your - WIDE on Sliding ensure steel fits by kit hardware Kit Door 10ft If Little SELLER at 5ft thickness missing us replacement Door 6.6ft Steel Pulleys number. 2pcs first please meet no texture it. J-Shape and using 5 item nice help is Upgraded parts.We Shape black Make Long Material T Single 8” of They panel fits satisfying solve compatible we 8“ to Door 6ft needs. capacity: for 350 Homlux defect Fit POM Product Pants contact arrives Carbon sliding. Door-- the Included are Excellent can Nylon Included-- fit End FT Nike Panel Wide 1 High 4 easily frosted 17円 Kids Compatibl 6.6 made surface. Fit 4" 1 Frosted Description WARRANTY sure bring J always Club shaped charge

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).


Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

Port Company PC54TT 100% Cotton Tank Top - Athletic Heather -

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)


Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)


Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.


Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.